felix's blog

More details to come as I prepare my keynote :)

https://www.elia-artschools.org/events/elia-academy/programme

Diskussion im Rahmen der Ausstellung Change Was Our Only Chance

Solidarität im Postdemokratischen und im Digitalen mit

- Barbara Prainsack, Politologin, Leiterin der Forschungsgruppe Zeitgenössische Solidaritätsstudien, Universität Wien

- Oliver Marchart, Politologe, Professur für Politische Theorie, Universität Wien

- Felix Stalder, Professor für Digitale Kultur und Theorien der Vernetzung, Hochschule der Künste Zürich

Kurzvorstellung Installation Change Was Our Only Chance in Anwesenheit von Time’s Up

Moderation: Elisabeth Falkensteiner

Eine utopische Zukunft verlangt eine kritische Gegenwart, in welcher die Dringlichkeit einer ökologischen, ökonomischen wie politisch-sozialen Veränderung ernst genommen wird. Das Rahmenprogramm will anregen über mögliche Alternativen und Strategien nachzudenken: Welche politischen Systeme können als emanzipatorische Modelle gedacht werden, sind postdemokratische Theorien Grundlagen für politische Prozesse auch in der digitalen Entwicklung? Welche Rolle spielt die Digitalisierung auch für Demokratisierungsprozesse?

Mittwoch 10 Juli, 2019 19:00 – 22:00

Angewandte Innovation Lab
Franz-Josefs-Kai 3, 1010 Vienna, Austria

Offizielle Ankündigung

Beautiful and open accessAbstract: One of the consequences of digitization is a deepening crisis of epistemology, caused by the proliferation of social, biological and machinic actors that overwhelm established methods of generating and organizing knowledge. Machine-driven analysis of large data sets is introducing a new way of doing science. In this, it is answering to this crisis while, at the same time, deepening it. Continuing to claim ‘scientific objectivity’ is becoming ever more impossible and in practice is likely to serve as a way to abdicate responsibility for the actual research and its consequences. Rather, we should seek to highlight the positionality and partiality of any claim, also and in particular in data science, thus rendering more obvious the need to combine competing claims into an understanding of the world that is not so much inter- but rather multi-subjective.

Keywords: epistemology, digitality, data science, reproducibility crisis, multi-subjectivity

One of the consequences of digitization is a deepening crisis of epistemology, caused by the proliferation of social, biological and machinic actors that overwhelm established methods of generating and organizing knowledge (Stalder 2018). And, since there is a close relationship between epistemology and politics, between ways of knowing and ways of managing the world, we are also in a deep political crisis. This manifest itself not the least in a populist rejection of ‘science’ and ‘facts’ (Manjoo 2008). This crisis of the established – let’s call it modern-liberal – epistemic-political order has created a space for the establishment of a new one, which doesn’t yet have a name, even if its outlines are already visible.

Ich werde die Keynote als Einführung in die Begriffe Digitalisierung (Prozess) und Digitalität (Bedingung) halten.

Was ist Digitalität? Philosophische und pädagogische Perspektiven

LMU München, 28. und 29. Juni 2019

Oettingenstraße 67, Hörsaal B001

Organisiert von

Prof. Dr. Uta Hauck-Thum (Grundschulpädagogik und -didaktik)
Prof. Dr. Dieter Frey (Center for Leadership and People Management)
Dr. Jörg Noller (Lehrstuhl I für Philosophie)

Der Begriff der Digitalität ist erst in jüngster Zeit ins Zentrum der Kultur- und Geisteswissenschaft gerückt. Er entspricht nicht dem Verständnis von Digitalisierung im Sinne der Entwicklung von Technologien, der Erfassung und Speicherung von Daten und der Automatisierung von Abläufen. Vielmehr reflektiert Digitalität auf kulturelle und gesellschaftliche Realitäten und Lebensformen, die mit der Digitalisierung einhergehen und diese im Wechselspiel wiederum ermöglichen. Ziel der Tagung ist es, das Phänomen der Digitalität näher zu bestimmen und den Blick auf kulturelle, didaktische und soziologische Aspekte des Lebens in einer digitalisierten Welt zu richten. Folgende Fragen stehen dabei im Zentrum:

* In welchem Verhältnis stehen die Phänomene „Digitalisierung“ und „Digitalität“?
* Wie verändern sich Lehr- und Lernprozesse im Kontext von Digitalisierung und Digitalität?
* Welche Herausforderungen, Chancen und Probleme ergeben sich aus der Digitalität für die Zukunft der Gesellschaft und der Universitäten?
* Wie lässt sich die Kultur der Digitalität gezielt gestalten und vermitteln?

Übersicht und Programm

I will give a keynote called "Three dimensions of the digital city." Three dimensions are people, things, and nature. And all three of them are being internally and externally re-organized to deal with the growth of complexity. And a key component of the material infrastructure on which this is happening is digital technology.

About the conference
In the twenty-first century, urbanization and ecosystems deterioration are affecting cities and their peripheries making them the nexus of mankind’s challenges and opportunities. Conventional top-down master planning and municipality policymaking are not delivering the systemic changes needed to improve urban space living conditions for city citizens.

International Conference and Summer School’2019 Technopolitics in Urban Regeneration: Co-creating Public Spaces will tackle several questions with an argument that cities are a melting pot of new forms of sociability and collective action founded on an association between humans and digital technologies.

The full programm is here.

I will take part in Session 1. Full Program (PDF)

SESSION 1 – TIME FOR A FAIR DIGITAL FUTURE (Call to Europe format)

We should stop treating the development, deployment and use of digital technology as something that is beyond our control. The systematic surveillance, the massive monopolies and increasing inequality are by no means an inevitable feature of the online environment. Instead of accepting this, and trying to adapt to it, we should actively shape the digital transition and change its direction.

To do so, we need to take a cold hard look at the private interests that drive much of today’s technological development. How can we put a stop to the business model that treats humans as tools, a mere source of data to be extracted? How can we support alternatives, and ensure that essential public values and interests buttress the online environment? How can we expand the digital commons and steer demand towards more privacy-friendly services? Digital technology has tremendous potential to increase human flourishing, and to support our citizens and democracies, but we need to take conscious decisions to bring about that future. This Call to Europe session aims to find elements for a European approach to the digital transition, in an interactive discussion between politicians, academics and civil society.

This is an edited version of a presentation given at the “TCS Philosophy & Literature Conference 2019” (29 May – 2 June 2019) as part of a panel called “Creating Commons”, with Jeremy Gilbert and Tiziana Terranova. At this panel, my task was to present our research project Creating Commons. Given the short time for the presentation (20 minutes), I focused on four library projects, Ubu, aaaaarg, Monoskop, and Memory of the World (MotW) and I tried to distill some of the things we learned through them into “four theses on cultural commons”. So, here they are:

1. Infrastructure is politics
2. Copyright is so broken that few are left to enforce it.
3. Care is core
4. Appropriation is better than participation

Read the full text over at the Creating Commons research website.

15 years ago, Mark Zuckerberg launched Facebook, then still called thefacebook, as a network for students at Harvard University. Today, almost 2.7 billion people use its services. And for 15 years he has been stressing like a prayer wheel that "connecting" and "sharing" make the world a better place and that Facebook stands for the epochal transition from oppressive hierarchical bureaucracies to liberating horizontal networks.

Today, he's pretty much on his own with that statement. On the one hand, Facebook Inc. has grown into an overpowering, opaque company that has incorporated 72 companies to date, including Instagram (2012), WhatsApp (2014), and virtual reality developer Oculus VR (2014). Moreover, the ownership structure is such that Zuckerberg can exercise almost unlimited power. On the other hand, Facebook is accused of facilitating the dissemination of false or manipulative information and thus contributing to the division of societies and the intensification of conflicts, for example in Great Britain, Sri Lanka, the USA, and Myanmar.

How could a harmless idea - people should be able to communicate easily and quickly with their friends and acquaintances - unfold such a destructive force? The answer is less to be found in the idea of horizontal communication itself or in digital media in general, but in the specific way Facebook implements this idea.

12.06.2019 // 18:15 // ArchipelagoLab (C5.225)
Study Night: Artistic Practices of Commoning
Zu Gast: Cornelia Sollfrank, Shusha Niederberger, Felix Stalder (Berlin/Zürich)

Künst­le­ri­sche und ak­ti­vis­ti­sche Stra­te­gi­en des Com­mo­n­ing ge­hen über den Un­ter­halt und die Zugäng­lich­ma­chung von Res­sour­cen hin­aus. Fra­gen von au­to­no­mer In­fra­struk­tur, al­ter­na­ti­ven Wis­sens­for­men und ein er­wei­ter­tes Verständ­nis ästhe­ti­scher Pra­xis wer­den nicht nur dis­kur­siv auf­ge­wor­fen, son­dern auch ex­pe­ri­men­tell um­ge­setzt.

An­hand von Bei­spie­len aus ih­rem ak­tu­el­len For­schungs­pro­jekt „Crea­ting Com­mons" ent­wi­ckeln Fe­lix Stal­der, Cor­ne­lia Soll­frank und Shu­sha Nie­der­ber­ger an­hand von drei kon­kre­ten künst­le­risch-ak­ti­vis­ti­schen Pro­jek­ten aus dem Be­reich der Di­gi­tal Com­mons die zu­grun­de lie­gen­den Fra- ge­stel­lun­gen und Stra­te­gi­en.

Mehr In­fos un­ter http://creatingcommons.zhdk.ch